Published by TITUS Solicitors | April 2026
The Hong Kong Immigration Department (“ImmD”) has quietly added a new addendum to a long list of its visa application guidelines, materially changing the position for thousands of foreign professionals, talents, students and their dependants currently in Hong Kong.
If you, your staff, or your assignees are on a work or talent visa and your limit of stay is approaching, you need to read this carefully.
What changed
The new addendum (dated April 2026) is now appended to ID(E)/ID(C) Forms 982, 991, 1000, 1018, 1026, 1032 and 1034. In practical terms, this captures most of the major employment and talent admission schemes, including as of the time of drafting:
- General Employment Policy (GEP)
- Admission Scheme for Mainland Talents and Professionals (ASMTP)
- Immigration Arrangements for Non-local Graduates (IANG)
- Quality Migrant Admission Scheme (QMAS)
- Top Talent Pass Scheme (TTPS)
- Technology Talent Admission Scheme (TechTAS)
- Admission Scheme for the Second Generation of Hong Kong Permanent Residents
The operative wording of the addendum is direct:
“Unless approved by the Director of Immigration under exceptional circumstances, persons subject to a limit of stay must depart Hong Kong before the expiry of their limit of stay, even if they have applied to the Director of Immigration for an extension of stay and the application is under processing. Breach of condition of stay (including overstaying) is a serious criminal offence.”
Why this matters
Many applicants — and frankly, many employers and HR teams — have been operating on the working assumption that as long as an extension application was filed before the limit of stay expired, the applicant could legitimately remain in Hong Kong while ImmD processed the application.
The new addendum makes clear that this is not the position. The default rule is now: if your limit of stay expires before ImmD makes a decision, you are expected to leave Hong Kong, regardless of whether your extension application is in the queue. Remaining beyond your limit of stay is overstaying, and overstaying is a criminal offence that can lead to prosecution and removal.
This is a significant change in expectation, even if ImmD frames it as a “clarification.”
Who is most exposed
The people most likely to be caught out are:
- Foreign professionals on GEP / TTPS / IANG visas approaching expiry
- Mainland talents under ASMTP whose extension is still pending
- Recent graduates relying on IANG to bridge into employment
- Dependants of any of the above
- Employers who assumed that a filed extension was a “safe harbour” while the application sat with ImmD
What you should do now
- File earlier. From 1 March 2026, ImmD already accepts extension applications up to three months before expiry in place of the previous four week window. You should now use that full window. The addendum specifies that, in all circumstances, applications should be submitted at least six weeks before expiry.
- Plan for processing time. ImmD says processing typically takes about two to three weeks once a complete application and fee are received — but this is not guaranteed.
- Diary the expiry date — not the filing date. Filing the application no longer protects you from overstaying.
- If your limit of stay will expire before a decision is issued, get advice immediately. The Director can grant exceptional approval to remain pending decision, but this is discretionary, not automatic.
- Treat any breach as serious. Overstaying carries criminal liability and can affect future visa applications, employment, and removal records.
How TITUS can help
TITUS Solicitors advises foreign professionals, employers, fintech and virtual asset businesses, startups, and international companies on Hong Kong immigration matters every week. If you are unsure whether your situation is caught by the new addendum, or you need help planning an extension or applying for an exceptional approval, please speak to us.
Contact TITUS for a consultation →
Disclaimer: This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. The position of the Hong Kong Immigration Department may change, and individual circumstances vary. Please seek tailored advice from a qualified Hong Kong solicitor before making any decision based on this content.
