by Titus | 5 月 15, 2026 | 商業法
供應商送錯貨，又拒絕退款；昔日的生意夥伴帶走了整份客戶名單；對方簽了合約、收了錢，然後翻臉不認人。在香港做生意，總有一天你要問自己一條大部分創業者都不願意問的問題：我是否真的要告這個人？ 這份指南，是我們希望更多企業東主在踏進律師樓之前就讀過的。它不會把你變成訴訟律師，但會讓你對香港商業訴訟的流程有更實在的掌握，在第一次與律師會面時談得更有效率，並避開那些悄悄花掉最多錢的錯誤。 第零步：你是否真的應該興訟？ 在你腦海裡開始草擬狀書之前，先問三條問題。...
by Titus | 4 月 30, 2026 | 商業法, 家庭法
TITUS | 2026年4月 香港入境事務處（入境處）近日於多份簽證申請指引中，悄悄加入一段新的「附錄」，對全港數以千計持工作簽證、人才簽證及學生簽證人士，以及其受養人，影響深遠。 如閣下本人、貴公司外籍員工或正在輪候批核的延期申請人士，逗留期限即將屆滿，請務必細閱本文。 究竟改了甚麼 最新附錄（2026年4月發佈）已加入以下表格：ID(E) / ID(C) 982、991、1000、1018、1026、1032 及 1034。換言之，截至本文撰寫時，香港絕大多數工作及人才入境計劃均受影響，包括： 一般就業政策（GEP）...
by Titus | 3 月 13, 2026 | Articles, 博客, 商業法, Investment
Last updated: 3 March 2026 Most “fund formation” pain is not legal theory. It’s execution. The structure looks fine on a diagram, but then: – bank onboarding stalls, – counterparties ask basic questions no one prepared for, – approvals are unclear,...
by Titus | 3 月 13, 2026 | Articles, 博客, 商業法, Investment
Last updated: 13 March 2026 “0% carried interest” is one of the most misunderstood headlines in Hong Kong funds marketing. The reality is more nuanced: – there is a carried interest concession regime, – it has effective dates and conditions, – and...
by Titus | 3 月 13, 2026 | Articles, 博客, 商業法, Investment
Last updated: 13 March 2026 DIPN 61 is the Inland Revenue Department’s “Departmental Interpretation and Practice Note” explaining how it interprets and applies Hong Kong’s profits tax exemption for funds (often called the “unified fund exemption”). If you are advising...
by Titus | 3 月 13, 2026 | Articles, 博客, 商業法, Investment
Last updated: 13 March 2026 An OFC is often described as Hong Kong’s “corporate-style” fund vehicle. That’s true—but it’s also the reason OFCs require more upfront sequencing than many clients expect. For private OFCs, two topics decide whether your structure works in...
